<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NC&#8217;s Prop 8?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robustmcmanlypants.org/blog/2009/02/25/ncs-prop-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robustmcmanlypants.org/blog/2009/02/25/ncs-prop-8/</link>
	<description>Camo Pants with a Lavender Fringe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.robustmcmanlypants.org/blog/2009/02/25/ncs-prop-8/comment-page-1/#comment-13747</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 23:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robustmcmanlypants.org/blog/?p=883#comment-13747</guid>
		<description>What NC has is a &quot;Defense of Marriage&quot; law that is a statute but is not a part of the state constitution.  Professional homophobes think that a law-but-not-amendment is too easy to have repealed or overturned in the courts.  If they can get an amendment passed, no court case seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage will ever succeed because the courts merely weigh the constitutionality of statutes; they don&#039;t decide what is or isn&#039;t a good idea on principle.  

At any rate, you&#039;re half-right:  gay marriage is illegal in NC and recognition of it is illegal.  People can go have private ceremonies but the law makes it illegal for any county to issue a marriage license or for state government to recognize marriage licenses from other states where it is legal.

In all honesty, I think the right wing functions - and has always functioned - by identifying scapegoats and then milking them dry with campaigns of fear and ignorance targeted at their base knowing full well that America&#039;s history - when summed together - is one of expanding equality and that they are virtually guaranteed to lose their fight-of-the-moment in the end.  

Thus, getting an amendment - not just a law - poisons the well for the future.  The law we (and every other state, almost) passed in the &#039;90s already makes it illegal for The Boyf and me to be legally recognized.  If they can get an amendment, though, that means that the next generation and maybe a couple more after that will also be second-class citizens, denied thousands of legal rights and duties that are instantly conferred when a marriage license is signed, because amendments to the constitution are so much more difficult to get rid of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What NC has is a &#8220;Defense of Marriage&#8221; law that is a statute but is not a part of the state constitution.  Professional homophobes think that a law-but-not-amendment is too easy to have repealed or overturned in the courts.  If they can get an amendment passed, no court case seeking legal recognition of same-sex marriage will ever succeed because the courts merely weigh the constitutionality of statutes; they don&#8217;t decide what is or isn&#8217;t a good idea on principle.  </p>
<p>At any rate, you&#8217;re half-right:  gay marriage is illegal in NC and recognition of it is illegal.  People can go have private ceremonies but the law makes it illegal for any county to issue a marriage license or for state government to recognize marriage licenses from other states where it is legal.</p>
<p>In all honesty, I think the right wing functions &#8211; and has always functioned &#8211; by identifying scapegoats and then milking them dry with campaigns of fear and ignorance targeted at their base knowing full well that America&#8217;s history &#8211; when summed together &#8211; is one of expanding equality and that they are virtually guaranteed to lose their fight-of-the-moment in the end.  </p>
<p>Thus, getting an amendment &#8211; not just a law &#8211; poisons the well for the future.  The law we (and every other state, almost) passed in the &#8217;90s already makes it illegal for The Boyf and me to be legally recognized.  If they can get an amendment, though, that means that the next generation and maybe a couple more after that will also be second-class citizens, denied thousands of legal rights and duties that are instantly conferred when a marriage license is signed, because amendments to the constitution are so much more difficult to get rid of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.robustmcmanlypants.org/blog/2009/02/25/ncs-prop-8/comment-page-1/#comment-13746</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robustmcmanlypants.org/blog/?p=883#comment-13746</guid>
		<description>I have to say I&#039;m surprised, because I just assumed NC did in fact have an anti-gay amendment. Color me shocked!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say I&#8217;m surprised, because I just assumed NC did in fact have an anti-gay amendment. Color me shocked!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

